Introduction
The first printed advertisement was not a glossy poster, a newspaper ad or a modern brand campaign. It was a small commercial message designed to make a seller recognizable, a product trustworthy and a purchase easier. Its importance lies not in visual grandeur, but in a historical shift: advertising became mechanically reproducible.
When historians speak of “the first printed advertisement,” two cases must be distinguished. Globally, the earliest known printed commercial advertisement is usually associated with Jinan Liu’s Fine Needle Shop in Song-dynasty China. The surviving printing plate advertised sewing needles, used a white rabbit as a recognizable sign and communicated quality claims. In Europe, and especially in English print history, William Caxton’s advertisement for the Sarum Ordinal or Pyes of Salisbury from 1476/1477 is regarded as the earliest surviving printed advertisement in English publishing history. The University of Manchester identifies Caxton’s notice as an advertisement for his edition of the Sarum Ordinal, while the University of Washington presents the Jinan Liu needle advertisement as a Song-dynasty commercial advertisement from Shandong.
This distinction matters because marketing history should not be written as a purely European story. Printed advertising emerged earlier in China than in Europe, while Caxton’s notice represents a crucial European milestone after the arrival of movable-type printing in England. The Marketing Museum already refers to the Chinese needle advertisement in its historical timeline, so this article develops the wider historical context: why printing changed advertising, what made the Liu and Caxton examples significant, how early printed advertising relates to branding, and how the logic of printed promotion connects with older merchandising-like objects such as Roman souvenirs and medieval pilgrim badges.
From a marketing-history perspective, the first printed advertisement is important because it combines technology, retailing, branding, trust and distribution. Philip Kotler’s understanding of marketing as the creation, communication and delivery of value helps explain why even a small printed notice matters: it communicates value and directs buyers toward exchange (Kotler and Keller, 2016). Hartmut Berghoff’s view of marketing as a historically developed social technique is equally useful, because printed advertising shows how commercial persuasion became tied to media technology (Berghoff, 2007). Eric H. Shaw’s work on ancient and medieval marketing also helps avoid a narrow modern definition of marketing: the discipline emerged late, but market practices are much older (Shaw, 2016). The Routledge Companion to Marketing History explicitly surveys marketing history as a broader field of marketing activities and practices, not only modern theory (Jones and Tadajewski, 2016).
Advertising before Print
Printed advertising did not appear out of nowhere. Before print, commercial communication existed in many forms. Traders used cries, shop signs, market stalls, symbols, wall inscriptions, hand-painted notices and objects. In Roman Pompeii, for example, electoral notices, event announcements and commercial wall communication show that public promotional practices existed long before printing. In medieval towns, signs outside inns and workshops identified trades and sellers for customers who might not be literate.
These older forms were powerful, but they had limitations. A spoken sales cry disappeared as soon as it was heard. A shop sign was fixed to one location. A hand-painted notice had to be produced individually. A manuscript announcement could be copied, but slowly and expensively. Printing changed the economics of repetition. It allowed the same message, sign or sales claim to be reproduced more consistently and in greater numbers.
This is the core historical meaning of printed advertising. It did not invent persuasion. It industrialized repeatability. Once a commercial message could be printed, the seller could project a more stable identity beyond a single spoken moment. This was the foundation of later advertising, posters, catalogues, newspaper ads, packaging, labels and brand communication.
Jinan Liu’s Fine Needle Shop: The Earliest Known Printed Advertisement
The most frequently cited earliest printed advertisement is the Song-dynasty advertisement for Jinan Liu’s Fine Needle Shop in Shandong. The University of Washington’s Chinese Civilization materials describe it as a page advertisement from Jinan Liu’s Fine Needle Shop. The surviving object is associated with a printing plate used to reproduce the commercial message.
The advertisement is remarkable because it combines several elements recognizable to modern marketers. It names the shop, identifies the product, uses a visual emblem and communicates a quality promise. The white rabbit sign helped customers identify the shop. Research summaries describe the plate as promoting sewing needles made by the Liu family store in Jinan and note that the text instructed people to recognize the white rabbit in front of the shop as the sign.
This makes the advertisement more than a simple sales notice. It is an early example of printed branding. The white rabbit functioned like a logo or shop mark. The text made a product promise. The advertisement connected sign, seller and quality.
The product category is also important. Needles were practical everyday goods, but quality mattered. A poor needle might bend, break or fail in fine sewing. The advertisement therefore did what many later product advertisements would do: it reduced buyer uncertainty. It told customers that this seller used good material and produced reliable needles. Advertising here was not only attention-seeking; it was trust-building.
The Chinese case also reveals why printed advertising emerged early in an advanced urban and commercial society. Song China had sophisticated printing technologies, active urban markets and specialist producers. Commercial print was not an isolated curiosity but part of a broader world of exchange, literacy, material culture and urban consumption.
The White Rabbit as an Early Brand Sign
The white rabbit is one of the most fascinating elements of the Liu advertisement. In modern branding terms, it served as a distinctive visual asset. Customers could recognize it even if they did not read the entire text. The instruction to identify the shop by the white rabbit outside the entrance shows that the printed message and the physical shop sign worked together.
This matters because branding begins with recognition. Ross D. Petty’s work on brand identity protection emphasizes that brand marks historically reduce confusion, identify origin and protect commercial reputation (Petty, 2016). The Liu advertisement did not operate under modern trademark law, but it shows the same basic commercial logic: a sign distinguished one seller from others.
The white rabbit also connected outdoor recognition with printed reproduction. A customer could see the rabbit on a printed notice and then recognize it at the shop. That is an early form of integrated communication. The sign existed in more than one medium: shopfront and printed advertisement. That connection between printed message and physical retail location is one of the earliest recognizable features of advertising strategy.
William Caxton and the First Surviving Printed Advertisement in English
In European print history, William Caxton’s advertisement for the Sarum Ordinal or Pyes of Salisbury is a landmark. The University of Manchester Library identifies the object as Caxton’s advertisement for his edition of the Sarum Ordinal. It was produced in the early age of English printing and is widely described as the earliest surviving printed advertisement in English publishing history.
Caxton was England’s first printer. His Westminster press was not only a production site but also a commercial enterprise. The advertisement directed potential customers to his shop at the Red Pale in the Almonry at Westminster. The notice was designed for public display on a wall or door, which makes it an early printed poster or handbill rather than a newspaper advertisement.
The product being advertised was not a popular entertainment text, but a liturgical guide. The Sarum Ordinal helped priests navigate the church calendar and liturgical observance. The audience was therefore specific: clergy and those involved in religious practice. This makes Caxton’s notice an early example of targeted advertising. It did not need to reach everyone. It needed to reach the right readers.
Caxton’s advertisement demonstrates that printers quickly understood the commercial value of print beyond books themselves. Print could produce the product and promote the product. The printer became publisher, retailer and advertiser at once.
Why Caxton Was Not the World’s First Printed Advertiser
Caxton’s advertisement is sometimes described as “the first printed advertisement.” That statement is only accurate with qualification. It is not the world’s earliest known printed advertisement. The Chinese Jinan Liu advertisement is older. Caxton’s notice is more accurately described as the earliest surviving printed advertisement in English or the earliest surviving printed book advertisement in English publishing history.
This distinction is not pedantic. It prevents a Eurocentric misunderstanding of advertising history. China’s print and commercial traditions produced printed advertising centuries before Caxton. Europe’s contribution lies in the rapid expansion of printed communication after movable-type printing, especially in books, pamphlets, broadsides and later newspapers.
A historically careful formulation is therefore: the earliest known printed commercial advertisement is usually associated with Song-dynasty China and Jinan Liu’s Fine Needle Shop; the earliest surviving printed advertisement in English is William Caxton’s notice for the Sarum Ordinal from 1476/1477.
Print, Repetition and the Birth of Scalable Selling
The great innovation of printed advertising was not simply that it put words on paper. The innovation was scalable repetition. A seller could reproduce the same name, symbol and message multiple times. This created consistency, and consistency is central to branding.
Before print, a seller’s message changed with every speaker, painter or scribe. Print stabilized communication. The same sign could recur. The same wording could be distributed. The same promise could accompany the same seller. This was a step toward modern brand identity.
Wally Olins later defined corporate identity as making strategy visible through design (Olins, 1989). The first printed advertisements were far simpler than modern identity systems, but they began the same process: making commercial identity visible through repeatable signs.
The Liu advertisement did this with the white rabbit. Caxton did this with the printed notice directing buyers to his shop. Both examples show how print connected seller, product, place and trust.
Printed Advertising and the Early Book Trade
The book trade was one of the first European sectors to benefit from printed advertising. Books were relatively expensive and often needed explanation. Potential buyers needed to know what had been printed, where it could be obtained and why it was useful. Caxton’s advertisement performed exactly that function.
This makes the early book market important for marketing history. Printers had to create demand for printed objects. They used notices, catalogues, title pages, colophons and shop signs. The printed book did not automatically sell itself. It required distribution and communication.
James Raven’s work on book history and print culture is relevant here because the book trade was never just literary; it was commercial, logistical and promotional. Printed advertising was one tool in that system.
From Handbill to Newspaper Advertisement
The earliest printed advertisements were handbills, notices and posters. Later, periodic newspapers created a new advertising environment. A newspaper offered regular publication, recurring readership and space for repeated commercial messages. This changed advertising from occasional notice to serial media practice.
The transition from Caxton’s wall notice to newspaper advertising is therefore one of the major developments in marketing history. A wall notice depends on physical placement. A newspaper advertisement travels with the publication and reaches readers in a recurring media habit.
Modern advertising historians such as Daniel Pope, Stephen Fox, Juliann Sivulka and Michael Schudson have shown how advertising later became professionalized through newspapers, magazines, agencies and mass consumer markets. But that later system rested on a simple earlier principle: commercial messages could be printed, repeated and distributed.
Printed Advertising and Trust
Early printed advertisements also created trust. Printed words could appear more stable and authoritative than spoken claims. They did not guarantee truth, but they gave the message material form. A printed advertisement could be shown, saved, posted and recognized.
The Liu advertisement used print to connect product quality with a recognizable sign. Caxton’s notice used print to guide buyers to a named seller. In both cases, advertising reduced uncertainty. It told customers who the seller was, what was available and why the offer mattered.
Rowena Olegario’s work on credit and trust is relevant because markets depend on credibility, reputation and institutions (Olegario, 2006). Printed advertising became one tool for making credibility visible.
The Link between Printed Advertising and Early Merchandising
The user’s requested theme also asks for the oldest verifiable merchandising articles. Printed advertising and merchandising are different, but historically connected. Printed advertising reproduces a message. Merchandising reproduces meaning in an object.
Some of the oldest securely identifiable merchandising-like objects include Roman souvenirs and medieval pilgrim badges. Maggie Popkin’s study of Roman souvenirs shows that objects such as place-related glass vessels and spectacle-related items helped Romans remember places, events and imperial experiences (Popkin, 2022). Cambridge University Press describes her work as a study of souvenirs and the experience of empire in ancient Rome.
The British Museum preserves lead-alloy pilgrim souvenirs from the shrine of St Thomas Becket at Canterbury, including hollow-cast ampullae decorated with scenes from Becket’s cult and dated to the late medieval period, with one ship-shaped Becket ampulla dated around 1170–1250.
These objects were not printed advertisements, but they share an important historical principle: reproducible signs create portable meaning. A Becket ampulla carried the shrine’s identity beyond Canterbury. A Roman souvenir carried the memory of a place or spectacle beyond the original experience. A printed advertisement carried a seller’s message beyond speech.
Roman Souvenirs as Early Merchandising
Roman souvenirs are among the strongest ancient examples of merchandising-like objects. They could be linked to places, spectacles or experiences. A vessel showing Baiae or Puteoli could evoke travel, leisure and imperial geography. A lamp with gladiator imagery could bring the arena into domestic life.
Popkin’s work is important because it treats Roman souvenirs as meaningful objects, not trivial curiosities. They helped users remember, display and narrate experiences (Popkin, 2022). This resembles modern merchandising, where an object extends an experience: a museum mug, a concert shirt, a sports scarf or a theme-park figurine.
The comparison must remain cautious. Roman souvenir production did not involve modern licensing or brand management. But it did involve object-based association. That is the root of merchandising.
Medieval Pilgrim Badges and Ampullae as Mass Merchandising
Medieval pilgrim badges and ampullae are even clearer examples of early mass merchandising. They were inexpensive, portable, recognizable and connected to specific shrines. Pilgrims wore them on hats, cloaks or bags, turning the body into a moving display surface.
The British Museum’s Becket ampullae show how specific these objects could be. They were not generic religious tokens. They referred to the shrine of Thomas Becket at Canterbury and carried imagery connected to his cult.
In marketing terms, these objects combined souvenir, proof of participation, devotional object and visible identity marker. They show that merchandising did not begin as entertainment commerce only. It also emerged in religious travel, pilgrimage economies and sacred place marketing.
Why the Oldest Merchandising Objects Matter for Printed Advertising
The connection between early merchandising and printed advertising is not that one caused the other. The connection is that both show how markets use reproducible signs.
A printed advertisement reproduces a sales message. A pilgrim badge reproduces a shrine identity. A Roman souvenir reproduces a place or spectacle in material form. All three make meaning portable.
This is why merchandising belongs in the same broader history as advertising. Advertising turns communication into circulation. Merchandising turns objects into communication. Both are essential to marketing history.
Avoiding Anachronism
It is important not to overstate the modernity of these early examples. The Liu needle advertisement was not a modern brand campaign. Caxton’s notice was not a newspaper advertisement. Roman souvenirs were not licensed fan merchandise. Pilgrim badges were not secular tourist souvenirs in the modern sense.
Mark Tadajewski’s critical marketing history warns against projecting modern marketing categories too easily into the past (Tadajewski, 2016). This warning is appropriate here. The correct claim is not that modern advertising already existed unchanged in the Song dynasty or fifteenth-century England. The correct claim is that key practices of advertising and merchandising—repeatable signs, seller identification, quality claims, place-linked objects and portable symbolic value—are historically very old.
Conclusion
The first printed advertisement marks a major transformation in marketing history. It did not invent advertising, but it changed what advertising could become. By making commercial messages reproducible, print allowed sellers to stabilize names, signs, quality claims and purchase instructions.
The earliest known printed commercial advertisement is usually associated with Jinan Liu’s Fine Needle Shop in Song-dynasty China. Its white rabbit sign, product identification and quality claim make it a remarkable early example of printed branding. In Europe, William Caxton’s 1476/1477 notice for the Sarum Ordinal or Pyes of Salisbury is the earliest surviving printed advertisement in English publishing history. It shows how the early book trade used print not only to produce books, but to sell them.
The requested link to early merchandising further deepens the story. Roman souvenirs and medieval pilgrim badges show that long before modern merchandise, people bought objects connected to places, events, shrines and experiences. The British Museum’s Becket ampullae and Popkin’s Roman souvenir research demonstrate that merchandising-like practices have deep roots.
The central historical insight is clear: marketing developed through media and objects before it developed as a formal discipline. Printed advertisements, souvenirs and badges all made value visible, repeatable and portable. The first printed advertisement was small, but it opened a path toward posters, catalogues, newspapers, packaging, brand marks and modern commercial media.
References
Beard, F. K. (2017): ‘The Ancient History of Advertising: Insights and Implications for Practitioners’, Journal of Advertising Research, 57(3), pp. 239–244.
Belk, R. W. (1988): ‘Possessions and the Extended Self’, Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), pp. 139–168.
Berghoff, H. (ed.) (2007): Marketinggeschichte: Die Genese einer modernen Sozialtechnik. Frankfurt am Main/New York: Campus.
British Museum (2026): Pilgrim badge; souvenir; ampulla. London: British Museum.
Caxton, W. (1477): Advertisement for the Sarum Ordinal or Pyes of Salisbury. Westminster: William Caxton.
Hollander, S. C. (1986): ‘The marketing concept: A déjà vu’, in Nevett, T. and Fullerton, R. A. (eds.): Historical Perspectives in Marketing. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Jones, D. G. B. and Tadajewski, M. (eds.) (2016): The Routledge Companion to Marketing History. London/New York: Routledge.
Kotler, P. and Keller, K. L. (2016): Marketing Management. 15th edn. Harlow: Pearson.
Levy, S. J. (1959): ‘Symbols for Sale’, Harvard Business Review, 37(4), pp. 117–124.
Manchester Digital Collections (2026): William Caxton’s advertisement for his edition of the Sarum Ordinal. Manchester: University of Manchester Library.
Olegario, R. (2006): A Culture of Credit: Embedding Trust and Transparency in American Business. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Olins, W. (1989): Corporate Identity: Making Business Strategy Visible Through Design. London: Thames & Hudson.
Petty, R. D. (2016): ‘A history of brand identity protection and brand marketing’, in Jones, D. G. B. and Tadajewski, M. (eds.): The Routledge Companion to Marketing History. London/New York: Routledge.
Popkin, M. L. (2022): Souvenirs and the Experience of Empire in Ancient Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shaw, E. H. (2016): ‘Ancient and Medieval Marketing’, in Jones, D. G. B. and Tadajewski, M. (eds.): The Routledge Companion to Marketing History. London/New York: Routledge.
Tadajewski, M. (2016): ‘Critical marketing history’, in Jones, D. G. B. and Tadajewski, M. (eds.): The Routledge Companion to Marketing History. London/New York: Routledge.
Twede, D. (2016): ‘A history of packaging’, in Jones, D. G. B. and Tadajewski, M. (eds.): The Routledge Companion to Marketing History. London/New York: Routledge.
University of Washington (2026): Commercial Advertisement: Jinan Liu’s Fine Needle Shop. Seattle: University of Washington.
